There are many aspects of our faith that we might question, and which we need to come to terms with, and I’ve only covered a handful of them here. Working through the questions that we have can take time, and I have come to see that the work of figuring out our faith, is a long-term project.
When we start seeking answers to our questions, we soon
realise that things aren’t as one sided as we may have thought. People have all
sorts of different views and interpretations, which are all apparently valid
and reasonable, but which are also contradict each other. This leads me to
believe that there is only one definitive truth we can be sure of, that it’s
impossible to have absolute knowledge of exactly who God is. We all have our
own personal beliefs which we carry, which resonate and feel true for us, but
we can’t know those beliefs are correct for certain, and so we can’t really
judge the beliefs of others, which don’t resonate with us or feel true, to be
wrong. We are all wrong in some way, because we are all deficient in our
understanding of God. All of our beliefs are skewed because of who we are, even
those which are grounded in good theological study, meditation, or tradition.
We can have all of those things and still come to different conclusions about
God, because we aren’t perfect, and therefore, our knowledge of God is
incomplete and imperfect.
This leaves us in a place of uncertainty, but I think that
this is a good place to be. When we wrestle with our faith we widen our
knowledge of God, and in doing so I believe we can move closer to the Divine,
by leaning into that mystery. I’m aware of the paradox here, and that really,
by broadening our understanding of God we highlight the vastness of our
ignorance, and the uncertainty we find can overwhelm us. Nevertheless, having
been on this journey for a while, I can say that widening my understanding of
God, has brought me closer to God, although it isn’t without complication.
This brings us to the crux of the whole problem of
unanswerableness.
Our instincts tell us that there needs to be certainty in
what we believe, and so when we hold the complexities of theology and faith, we
feel the need to distinguish one view as being truer than another. We discern
that truth based on our own experiences and capacities for knowledge, or to put
it simply, we believe what we believe because of who we are. All the things
which make us unique individuals, inform our reasons for believing what we
believe. This isn’t something we don’t know already, it’s not a great epiphany,
however, I think this is an important truth for us to hold, if we intend to
find a way forward in the unanswerable. When we hold this truth, it informs how
we see other people and the beliefs they have.
Other people can’t be wrong in their beliefs, because they
are just like us, they believe what they believe, because of who they are, what
they have experienced in their lives, and what they know of the world. This
should make us more tolerant and accepting of each other, and it should change
how we interact with one another. You can’t condemn someone for the thing they
believe, because their beliefs are grounded in who they are, and likewise,
others can’t condemn you for the things you believe, because your
understandings are informed by who you are.
There would be massive implications if we could all accept
this, but for one, if Christians throughout history had understood this truth,
then there would be more unity in the church today. We would have avoided all
the various schisms and splits within churches, because people would have just
accepted that they each had different understandings when it came to their
faith, and that this was normal. Instead of fighting and arguing, Christians
throughout history would merely have been politely inquisitive of other
people’s beliefs, and engaged in respectful dialogue with them, and learned how
that person had come to that particular understanding. OK, I know it’s not as
simple as that, much has prevented us from engaging with each other in this
way, hurdles like religious history, church politics, and basic human
misbehaviour. These things aren’t insubstantial, and might even seem
insurmountable when you think about them, but I still think we could be doing a
better job of loving and respecting each other. If we were more like this, then
the worldwide church today would look completely different. But the sad fact is
that we aren’t even capable of being civil with each other when it comes to our
personal beliefs. Just take a look at the comments made by Christians in the
digital Gehenna, that is the bottom half of the internet.
It seems there is one common denominator which is at play
here, that for whatever reason, people can’t or don’t want to accept that they
might be wrong about what they believe. This is an unspoken theme that we’ve
encountered throughout this book. The Catholic church couldn’t accept that they
might be wrong about the Earth being the centre of the universe, so they put
Galileo in prison. Pastors have bullied people into manifesting gifts of the
Holy Spirit, because they won’t accept that the charismatic doctrines of their
church might be wrong, or that the Spirit isn’t acting in their churches in the
way they’d like it to. Preachers don’t accept the complexity of subjects like
Hell, because it’s easier to double down and push the easily digestible truth
they have been handed by someone else, than to wrestle with what the Bible
actually says, and work out what they really believe.
There are all sorts of reasons why we don’t want to be
wrong, but our response is to grasp the truth we find, and hold onto it for
dear life, because the alternative, uncertainty and unknowing, is apparently
too much for us to bear. We need the security of certainty in all the areas of
our lives, but we need it all the more when it comes to our faith, because
faith is the one thing that matters to us the most, that we can’t be absolutely
sure of.
However, faith isn’t about certainty, literally, by
definition, faith is belief and trust without proof. Faith is the opposite of
certainty, and so professing absolute truth when it comes to our faith, to God,
and to the Bible, is a fallacy. Besides, a faith of certainty is not something
we could ever realistically achieve. For us to have absolute certainty in our
faith, we would need to possess the ability to disconnect from who we are
individually, corporately, personally and societally, and we would have to be
completely conscious of ourselves, and know ourselves thoroughly. We would need
to be able to consider every truth we encounter, whilst disregarding every bias
which might colour our perceptions of that truth. You would basically need to
become an omniscient spectator of your own existence, which I would say is
probably impossible for a human to achieve. The fact that we have to write
to-do lists, kind of suggests that the human brain isn’t really set up for
omniscience.
Consequently, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that
humans are incapable of providing completely objective interpretations on
theology, and I don’t think we can confidently present our own personal beliefs
as absolute biblical truths, even if God did reveal them to us somehow. God
demonstrating absolute truth to a human, as God would understand it, is like a
chef trying to demonstrate molecular gastronomy to a pig. Sure, the pig would
enjoy eating the food, and it might even appreciate the different flavour
profiles and textures going on, but it wouldn’t understand how the food was
created and the story that the chef was telling through the meal.
We could get much further into this, but the bottom line is
that we each hold onto our own truths, which are sometimes at odds with the
truths held by others, which is what we have seen when looking at all these
different topics. This can be summed up simply by the Aneurin Bevan quote/Manic
Street Preachers album name, and title of this chapter, “This Is My Truth Tell
Me Yours”.
We might come to accept that we each hold our own version
of truth which is incomplete in some way, and that we can share our own
personal truths with each other, in a spirit of reasonableness, love and
acceptance, but we are still left with some questions. What do we believe about
God and how do we know it is true? How can we trust that is who God is? How do
we tell other people about God, and know that we aren’t telling them lies or
misconstrued notions about the Divine? What are the implications when we do get
it wrong?
Text taken from “Unanswerable:
Exploring the Complexities of the Christian Faith and Biblical Truth”, which is
available from Amazon, and from all good book shops. An audiobook is also
available at https://mindmole.bandcamp.com/music
Comments
Post a Comment