Skip to main content

What the hell do we do with Hell? | Hell – Part 3


Moving forward, rather than spouting various theologians and their interpretations around Hell, it’s probably easier to look at what different Christian denominations believe.

 

Eastern Orthodox Christianity

 

The Eastern Orthodox Church is the second biggest church in the world, after the Catholic church, and it’s important because it professes to practice the faith of the early Christian church, which has been passed down through holy tradition. This means that in theory, their view of Hell is closest to the view held by the earliest Christians.

 

The Orthodox church believes that both Heaven and Hell are one plain of existence, or to put it differently, they are both the same place. Hell is not in one location, whilst Heaven is in another, they are both one. In the Orthodox faith, Heaven and Hell are experiences of God’s presence. Those who love God, experience the Divine presence as infinite joy, and eternal life. Those who hate God, experience that same presence as infinite torture and eternal death.

 

Another aspect of Hell in Orthodox Christianity is apocatastasis, which means ‘restoration’. This is the belief that all things will be restored, and it comes from Acts 3, when Peter heals a disabled beggar and then preaches to the onlooking crowd.

 

Acts 3:19-21

 

Repent therefore, and turn again, that your sins may be blotted out, so that there may come times of refreshing from the presence of the Lord, and that he may send Christ Jesus, who was ordained for you before, whom Heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God spoke long ago by the mouth of his holy prophets.

 

At one end of this interpretation, is the belief that everyone will be restored and reconciled to God, including those who are in Hell, even the Devil. At the other end is the belief that salvation is a gift from God and there is nothing that needs to be done to earn it. However, this gift must be accepted and God will not force salvation on people. The Church father, Origen, is thought to have taught a form of apocatastasis, along with other church fathers. As in all churches, there is some disagreement in the Orthodox faith about these interpretations, but this is a general belief within the church.

 

The implication of this view of Hell is that God does not punish people in Hell, but that people are punished and suffer according to their hearts and experiences of God. Whether the state of experienced Hell is eternal or whether it’s for a limited time, is a matter of discussion. Gregory of Nyssa, expressed the view that evil cannot hold in front of God forever, and that God will ultimately destroy Hell. Some people see this as annihilationism, that the souls of the damned will be destroyed and put out of their misery, but others take it to mean that Hell itself will be destroyed, and those who are in it will be reconciled to God. This view is backed up by St. Ephraim the Syrian, who famously prayed for the salvation of the Devil.

 

Roman Catholic

 

The Roman Catholic church was founded in 1054 CE, when it split from the Orthodox Church. The Catholic view of Hell evolved out of the Orthodox church and developed over time. The Catechisms of the Catholic Church, which inform doctrine to all Catholics, says that Hell is a place where the damned are eternally deprived of the beatific vision, the ultimate direct self-communication of God. People will not receive any consolation in Hell, they will be unable to escape from the pain of Hellfire, and they will not interact with anyone, except for the demons who tempted them.

There are additions to this doctrine of Hell, which have been provided by Popes, doctors of the church (saints who also provided important theological input into the church), and by people who experienced private revelations from God. These additions include visions of Hell being like a fiery furnace whose only light was a shade of red, that there are four torments of Hell which people experience depending how sinful they were, and visions of nuns being tormented in Hell because they broke their vows of silence.

Catholics also famously believe in the doctrine of purgatory, which is a place of suffering where the souls of sinners atone for their unforgiven sins, so that they can be purified before going to Heaven.

The Protestant Church


Protestantism began in 1517, following the Reformation which was led by Martin Luther. The Protestant church was established after it separated from the Catholic church, due to disagreements in doctrine.

 

Broadly speaking, Protestantism these days mostly signifies churches that are neither Orthodox or Catholic, and whilst there are differences in some aspects of theology and doctrine, the protestant view of Hell is generally speaking, the same.

 

The majority of Protestants hold the belief that Hell is a place of separation from God, and a place of eternal conscious torment, which is both physical and spiritual. Some theologians also believe that punishment in Hell will be proportional to the deeds of each soul. There is debate concerning the fate of those who have never had the opportunity to hear the gospel, such as children who die in infancy, and people without the mental capacity to receive the gospel. Most believe God will make an exception for these people, but there are others who believe that these people will be damned to Hell, because of original sin.

 

Aside from the infernalist belief of Hell as eternal conscious torment, there are some who believe in annihilationism, that sinners will be punished for a limited time, and then put out of their misery and destroyed, and a further minority on the fringes of Protestantism, who believe in Universal Reconciliation, or Christian Universalism. Universalists believe that after serving a sentence in Hell, all souls are reconciled to God and enter into Heaven. Universalism teaches that the concept of Hell as eternal conscious torment does not exist, and that an eternal Hell is against the nature of a loving God. This view has become more prominent in recent years and has reignited the discussions about Hell.

 

Looking at these different views, if we hold them all as divinely inspired and true, as those who believe them would say they are, then we still aren’t any closer to a clear understanding of Hell.

 

We might say that the Orthodox view is the most authentic as it maintains the view which was understood by the early church, and subsequent views adopted by churches who abandoned the Orthodox tradition are inaccurate, and that their understanding has strayed. Those who disagree with this view, see it as theologically infantile, or believe that God progressively revealed the true concept of Hell, centuries after the early Church.

 

The Catholic Church developed an understanding of Hell through its own theological interpretations, and revelations made to saints. It’s hard to argue with divine revelation, other than to say that some of the beliefs they arrived at were influenced by cultural understandings, and their own subconscious thoughts which manifested into dreams and visions, or that their beliefs are just wrong and they weren’t divinely inspired at all. This argument seems insubstantial, because the Catholic church is the biggest Christian denomination, and these beliefs have been held by billions of people over hundreds of years, and so they must have some standing.

 

The Protestant view is a further progression of the Catholic belief, and is therefore argued as being even further divine revelation. Again, there are huge numbers of Christians who have believed in this view of Hell, and proponents of this view of Hell would say that it is the ultimate revelation of the truth, which supersedes all previous doctrines. Again, it’s hard to argue with this, but when does divine revelation actually end. Did God draw a line under our theological understanding in the 1500s, proclaiming that there was nothing further to be revealed, or does God continue to speak to us and progressively reveal truth to us? If we believe that God is still active and speaking to us today, then we have to consider that there is more to be said on theological matters such as Hell, which we might not be willing to accept just yet. Christian Universalism is generally scoffed at by Protestant Christians, and has been branded as heretical by evangelicals, even though it’s resurgence could be further divine revelation. It is a doctrine which is rooted in the beliefs of the early Church and the Orthodox faith, and it’s a view that has been consistent throughout church history. It may be that it's currently a minority view and that the term ‘Christian Universalism’ is relatively modern itself, but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong. That said, it absolutely could be wrong, but so could any of the beliefs about Hell.

 

Looking at the different views of Hell in this way, is perhaps a more helpful way of grouping together some of the ideas we explored earlier. These views have been discussed, debated and refined by groups of Christians who have wrestled with the Bible. These denominational doctrines can provide us with more concise understandings on Hell, but that still doesn’t help us when it comes to knowing which one is right. All these denominations would argue that their view is the true, biblical view of Hell, but they can’t all be right. One of them has to be truer than the others, even if they are all wrong and incomplete in some way.

 

So, it basically comes down to this.

 

We can’t be completely certain about Hell, neither can we be absolutely certain about other beliefs we hold, question and struggle with. We can accept that all these things are mysteries, admit our humanity and our inability to know the answers to these questions, and this can be a helpful place to stand, but it isn’t something we are good at doing. We crave certainty, and we ultimately choose the truth we need to believe.

 

I can’t hold the opposing ideas of Hell in tension. I don’t know if I can fully love a God who has enabled a system of justice, which means sinners and unbelievers will be punished and tormented for eternity. I can fear that God, and I have feared that God, to the point where I have not known that God. However, I can love a God whose forgiveness is bigger than I can understand, whose love is better than I can imagine, and who can reconcile everyone in that love. I need to believe that is who God is, because the alternative for me means worshiping and following God in fear, and trying to love God without hope for my non-believing friends and family being saved. With all that said though, the view of God that I have needs to be rooted in the Bible, and it can’t just be something I want to be true, because it’s more palatable and less problematic. There are valid arguments for all the different views of Hell we have looked at, all of them have a biblical standing but at the same time, they can all be argued against. No one view can claim to have a water tight argument for truth, and so it ultimately does come down to what we understand to be true about God and what we feel in ourselves. 

 

This is a tricky subject to conclude, it’s contentious and complicated, but I think there are some fundamental truths that we can take away. The first is that Jesus doesn’t really talk about Hell that much, and where he does talk about it, punishment isn’t the point of what he is saying. Jesus’s message is that people should love God, and that they should love each other. If we fail to do those things there are consequences, but I don’t think Jesus talks about Sheol/Hades and Gehenna, because they are the reasons why we should love others and love God. If Hell was important to Jesus, then I think he would have provided an exact theology when he taught, and he didn’t. When we read the Bible, Sheol, Hades and Gehenna, are all presented as truth, but none of them are exact, but they are references for people, ideas that make them sit up and pay attention to the main message, which is the coming Kingdom of God, which Jesus does present a precise theology about. The Kingdom of God is about healing, restoration, forgiveness and love, and that is what Jesus is all about. Jesus only really mentions punishment a handful of times, but when we look at his ministry, we see him consistently bringing these kingdom realities to people.

 

In my opinion, the church has blown Hell way out of proportion, it has built ministries on Hell, and tried to save people by threatening it, but in doing so, it has distracted itself from the kingdom message of Jesus, which is to bring healing to those who are in need, to bring restoration to those who are broken, to bring forgiveness to those who believe they are not good enough, and to bring love to the world.

 

We don’t get to know what Hell really is if we read the Bible, but I think that is probably as it should be. However, we are told what the Kingdom of God is, and I think that should be our focus.

 

 

Text taken from “Unanswerable: Exploring the Complexities of the Christian Faith and Biblical Truth”, which is available from Amazon, and from all good book shops. An audiobook is also available at https://mindmole.bandcamp.com/music

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Girls Just Wanna Have Fun | Women in Leadership – Part 2

Despite all the women who were actively and positively involved in biblical and church history, i t always comes back to Eve, and the fact that she was responsible for the fall of humanity. Even if you read the story of Adam and Eve as fiction, by analogy, the story still shows that it was Eve’s fault that original sin happened, that she was a weak woman who gave in to sin, and persuaded Adam to sin with her. Adam is complicit though, this is clear if you read the story, but many Christians see Eve's actions as being responsible for the fall of mankind, and the consequences of her sin, run through the whole Bible.   Many Christians see this culminated in Paul's instructions in 1 Timothy 2.   I desire therefore that the men in every place pray, lifting up holy hands without anger and doubting. In the same way, that women also adorn themselves in decent clothing, with modesty and propriety, not just with braided hair, gold, pearls, or expensive clothing, but with good wo...

This is My Truth, Tell Me Yours | Faith and Belief - Part 1

There are many aspects of our faith that we might question, and which we need to come to terms with, and I’ve only covered a handful of them here. Working through the questions that we have can take time, and I have come to see that the work of figuring out our faith, is a long-term project.   When we start seeking answers to our questions, we soon realise that things aren’t as one sided as we may have thought. People have all sorts of different views and interpretations, which are all apparently valid and reasonable, but which are also contradict each other. This leads me to believe that there is only one definitive truth we can be sure of, that it’s impossible to have absolute knowledge of exactly who God is. We all have our own personal beliefs which we carry, which resonate and feel true for us, but we can’t know those beliefs are correct for certain, and so we can’t really judge the beliefs of others, which don’t resonate with us or feel true, to be wrong. We are all wrong...

Binding and Loosing | Faith and Belief - Part 2

What do we do with all of this?   One of the things I learned on my journey was the idea of binding and loosing. We see this in the gospel of Matthew. In these passages, Jesus tells his disciples that whatever they bind on earth will be bound in Heaven, and whatever they loose on earth will be loosed in Heaven. You won’t be surprised to hear that there are several different interpretations on binding and loosing, but the one I want to focus on is to do with how we interpret scripture, and that what we bind and loose in our biblical interpretations will be honoured by God. This is the understanding of binding and loosing that seems most logical to me, but it is also the understanding which I have struggled with the most.   Binding and loosing is a rabbinic term which means to forbid and permit, and was used when there were disputes concerning Jewish Law. For example, in the first century there were two rabbinic schools, the school of Shammai which was known to bind, and...